7
• Product criteria show how well students have achieved specific academic learning goals,
standards, or competencies, typically demonstrated through major assessments,
classroom quizzes, compositions, projects, reports, and other culminating activities.
• Progress criteria, sometimes called “growth” or “development” criteria, show how much
students have gained or improved in their learning. Students could make outstanding
progress, but still not be achieving at grade level, and highly skilled students might
achieve the product criteria without making notable improvement.
• Process criteria describe student behaviors that facilitate, broaden, or extend learning.
These may include activities that enable learning, such as formative assessments,
homework, and class participation. They also may reflect nonacademic social-emotional
learning skills, such as collaboration, goal setting, perseverance, habits of mind, or
citizenship. In some cases, they relate to students’ compliance with procedures, like
turning in assignments on time.
A hodgepodge grade
At the end of each marking period, teachers assign weights to these different sources of evidence
to tally a final score recorded on the report card (Sun & Cheng, 2013). Researchers call this a
“hodgepodge” grade (Brookhart, 1991) because it mixes achievement and other factors related to
behavior, attitude, effort, and improvement. It makes the report card grade a confusing
amalgamation that is impossible to interpret clearly and accurately (Guskey, 2020). An A, for
example, might mean that the student knew all the concepts before instruction began (product);
that she did not achieve the learning goals but made significant improvement (progress); or that
she put forth extraordinary effort (process).
Recognizing these problems, some grading reform advocates recommend that teachers use only
product criteria in determining students’ grades. They point out that the more progress and
process criteria come into play, the more subjective, biased, and inequitable grades become
(Feldman, 2023). How can a teacher know, for example, how difficult a task was for students or
how hard they worked to complete it? Many teachers point out, however, that if process elements
like homework and punctuality in turning in assignments don’t count, students will lose all
motivation to do homework or complete assignments on time — and evidence from schools
implementing these practices confirm their apprehensions (Randazzo, 2023; We Are Teachers,
2023).
Multiple grades for multiple criteria
A far more effective solution is not to eliminate progress or process criteria from grading but to
report these criteria separately. Teachers simply extract evidence on the important nonacademic
aspects of students’ performance and report those in their own section of the report card and the
transcript.
Although reporting multiple grades is relatively new in most U.S. schools, the practice has a
long-established history in other countries. In Ontario, Canada, for example, teachers have
reported multiple grades for students from 1st grade through high school for decades. Every